For better or worse, I am a product of public school education. Where I attended public school, there were few schooling options –the private, parochial school where the financially better-off sent their kids, or the public school. There were a few elementary schools dotted throughout the city neighborhoods, and then one public middle school and one public high school.
Back in the day, we were offered a public education that included elective “vocational” courses. General art class and band, while not technically considered vocational, were open to every student (and I won’t discuss what transpired when I came home with the violin; conversely, I was rather proud of all the hand ceramics I created while listening over and over and over to the Best of Bread album), as well as typing (yes, on an actual, manual typewriter) and the basics of business finances - spreadsheets and the like.
Then there were those courses that were gender segregated: sewing
and cooking for girls, woodworking and shop class for the guys. While I wasn’t
too interested in the latter, I also wasn’t too keen on the sewing class, but
it came part and parcel with the cooking, in which I was very interested, so I struggled through seaming a pair of pants
that no self-respecting teen would ever wear, and counted the class sessions
left until the measuring and rolling could begin.
It was fairly well established that one took the vocational
courses (especially shop and woodworking) if a student wasn’t on the universally
agreed-as-better-for-future-prospects college-prep track. Since I was whizzing
my way through AP English, French and
Latin (oh, the verbs I conjugated), my
time in cooking class was seen as pure fluff. Such is the long and winding (and
expensive) road of the designer.
We internalize
the popularly expressed value of work at a very early age. What all the adults pushed was the grand
and glorious benefits of college, and then only a certain type of college
experience, one which didn’t (and still doesn’t, really) include getting one’s
hands literally or figuratively dirty. Enter Matthew B. Crawford’s Shop Class as Soulcraft, a brilliant polemic against the prevailing wisdom that
everyone must be an information worker in order to have and engage in work that
has societal value.
Crawford, with a Ph.D. in political philosophy and ownership of his own motorcycle
repair business, makes the argument for the “useful arts” – his classification
for carpentry, plumbing, electrical work and mechanical repair. Using his own
rather colorful personal story, Crawford recounts his disengagement from that
of information worker to transformation to shop owner where he shoulders the
responsibilities of, as well as fully engages with, the uniquely complete sense
of accomplishment felt when he accurately diagnoses and repairs a mechanical
issue. As someone who solves construction problems almost daily (and then
memorializes those solutions for the general public – you know, pattern writing), I readily identify
with this sense of accomplishment.
Crawford is at his most sarcastically brilliant in the
chapter “The Contradictions of the Cubicle,” devoted to his short time as an
articles indexer. The opening paragraph
pretty much lays it out:
“The popularity of Dilbert, The Office, and any number of other
pop-culture windows on cubicle life attests to the dark absurdism with which
many Americans
have come to view their white-collar work. Absurdity is good for comedy, but
bad as a way of life. It usually indicates that somewhere beneath the
threshold of official notice fester contradictions that, if commonly admitted,
would bring on some kind of crisis … it is impossible to make sense of the [modern]
office without noticing that it has become a place of moral education, where
souls are formed and a particular ideal of what it means to be a good person is
urged upon us.”
As someone who has spent most of my adult working life in
offices of many stripes, I read this chapter and kept wanting to hit the
imaginary solidarity bell and yell out “ding, ding, ding.” If truth be
told, I probably did do that on several occasions. And if I am kneeling at the
truth altar, I must admit my brief complicity with and performance in this
absurdist dance while a design school instructor. How many former students groaned at
the mention of the dreaded group project? Yes, that was me attempting to instill a
particular value – damn the torpedoes, and all that.
Neither Crawford nor I are in any way suggesting a
disengagement from society and community – far from it. In fact, Crawford makes
the convincing case that as a small business owner in the business of dealing
with the real-world mechanical problems of his clients (most from his very own backyard),
he gets to see the consequences of his work up close and personal just about
most days. This provides him an opportunity not only to get better at his art,
but to reap the benefits of such a community presence.
Of course, Crawford writes what he knows – he is
a white guy and the book reflects that fact, which leads to my biggest
criticism of it. In many passages, he describes his willingness to learn at
the hands of those with more experience (of course, other guys), yet makes
many derogatory references (backhanded and otherwise) to maternalism and catty
female attitudes and behaviors. I wonder if he would have been such a willing
student if the teacher had been an attractive female, or if a woman telling an
off-color workplace joke at his expense might not make him just a tad
uncomfortable. I do note that his references to maternalism stem more from a
place of raising the status of self-reliance over dependence as opposed to someone dissing a
perspective based purely on gender, yet that independent spirit he wishes to foster - which has a
very rich history in this country - has been held and espoused by (mostly) old
white guys.
In the end, Crawford is advocating a particular kind of agency and freedom - one which fosters thinking for oneself as well as true diversity of mind and action, no stifling office trappings attached. He describes it as a sort of neo-republicanism. I'm certain my terminal degree informs my stance that I'm not willing to use such a loaded classification, but of course I do not possess a Ph.D. in political philosophy. All I know is that once you strip away all the jargon, Crawford lives a life that just makes sense, and accessibly describes it in Shop Class as Soulcraft. It is a way of being in the world that deserves its rightful place amidst what we value.
a.jpg)
